Monday, May 15, 2017

Guest Post by Tamar June (Dec '18)



Tamar June, MSW/MPH Student (Dec '18)
I wish to introduce myself as Tamar June, a first year Master's in Public Health and Master's in Social Work student. I am honored and humbled to be part of this dual program at the University of Georgia as what I now know of the benefits of interdisciplinary work seem to align perfectly with my experiences and interests moving forward into the workplace and ultimately the way I wish to live and interact with the surrounding community.

I have been at the University of Georgia for nearly 5 years and during that time have gained even more of an appreciation of how UGA interacts with my hometown of Athens. I grew up attending the schools within the Clarke County School District and find myself consistently advocating for outreach into our community to engage families in all that the university has to offer. Through my understanding, it is an imperative to give back knowledge and skills learned through collegiate studies to the communities we live in in creative and innovative ways that can engage more than one profession into multi-faceted projects and programs. The American Academy of Social Work and Social Welfare (2016) cites to just this by encouraging the creation of social responses to a changing environment. Environmental changes negatively affect health, and the changing global environment requires social and policy responses, innovative partnerships, community engagement, and human security interventions to strengthen individuals and communities (American Academy of Social Work, 2016).

The concept of a ‘dual professional’ means to me an individual who employs multiple frameworks of understanding together, even if they are in seeming discordance with one another. While the ethical priority of a clinical social worker may be to protect and value the self-determination of the individual first and foremost, the ethical priority of a public health practitioner is necessarily to protect the population and engender sustainable health. When situations come that test the boundaries of either profession, it should not be the denying of values or ethics that plays out, but rather the creative marriage of the two – how can we both protect our population, foster prevention and health, and encourage self-determination. This can and should be accomplished, and it is dual professionals that may lead the charge.

Thinking more abstractly, we are all multi-professionals. We have our employment(s), our homes, our schools, our activism, our churches, where we are able to share our thoughts from and for different perspectives. Identity as a dual professional comes with directly and explicitly finding constant balances and doing so by building cross-profession collaboration and appreciation. Collaborative networks seek to bring disparate groups together so that they can work effectively and synergistically together. Brokers support the controlled transfer of more specialized knowledge between groups, serve to increase cooperation by liaising with people from both sides of the gap, and improve efficiency by introducing ideas and solutions from one isolated setting into another (Long, et al., 2013).

As a prospective dual professional in Social Work and Public Health, I intend to represent both of my professional affiliations with respect and dignity, as well as curiosity for further development and success. This is how professions evolve and I fervently believe that the contributions that MPH/MSW practitioners will make to both fields, will be integral in the ever changing identity of both Social Work and Public Health in addition to Social Work Public Health.


- Tamar June, MPH/MSW Candidate (December 2018)

Visit Tamar June's LinkedIn Profile.


References
American Academy of Social Work & Social Welfare. (2016). Build financial capability for all. Retrieved from http://aaswsw.org/grand-challenges-initiative/12-challenges/build-financial-capability-for-all
Long et al. Bridges, brokers and boundary spanners in collaborative networks: a systematic review. BMC Health Services Research. 2013, 13:158

No comments:

Post a Comment